Construction Site Accident Attorney in Royalton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the bustling industry of Royalton, construction site accidents are unfortunately not uncommon. In these unfortunate circumstances, Carlson Bier stands as a knowledgeable and reliable advocate for the victims in their pursuit for justice. With excellence forged over years of practice, they have devoted themselves to championing rights and recovering millions for clients affected by Construction Site Accidents. They take pride in a meticulous approach that ensures each case garners complete understanding and robust representation tailored with personalized care towards every client’s unique needs. Not only this but also an outstanding record with success cases gives them an edge among competitors making them leaders when it comes to dealing with such legal complications within Illinois jurisdiction boundaries.What sets them apart is their commitment to direct lawyer-client interactions rather than delegating important tasks leaving your case in capable hands always.Simply put if someone falls victim to a construction accident within Royalton , entrusting their case to Carlson Bier will be nothing short of best considerations given their proven caliber.v

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Royalton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities and challenges faced by victims of Construction Site Accidents in Illinois. Our specialization as a personal injury attorney group equips us to passionately advocate for individuals who have been negatively impacted within such work environments.

Construction site accidents often yield severe injuries due to the inherently dangerous nature of these sites. These risks range from falling debris, tripping hazards, equipment malfunctions all the way to structural collapses. Consequently, this can lead to Sprains and strains, Cuts and lacerations, Contusions or bruises along with more severe conditions like Broken bones and fractures and Spinal cord injuries. No individual should be denied his or her rightful compensation under such draining circumstances.

When dealing with construction site defenses – on-site safety measures are critical factors too often overlooked by employers creating a hazardous environment for their employees. It is noteworthy that workers have rights under Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA) aimed at the provision of safe workplaces. Important considerations include:

– Regular maintenance checks on machinery

– Availability of Personal Protective Equipment

– Adequate fall protection systems

– Training programs emphasizing safety protocols

– Clear signage indicating potential danger zones

Yet when those safeguards fail or get neglected, our priority at Carlson Bier is to ensure each client gets fair representation in documenting claims substantiated by proper evidence collection right from medical records up till witness testimonies encompassing an accident’s root cause analysis.

We guarantee an accurate estimate of past and future medical expenditures incurred due to Construction Site Accidents factored into your claim along with lost wages and coverage for other expenses surfacing due to unexpected physical hardship following these unfortunate incidents.

Our expertise includes navigating Workers’ Compensation claims where benefits may cover ongoing treatments including rehabilitation costs amongst other expenses like disability pay if you have been out of work during your recovery period. Additionally, ill practices led by Insurance companies are commonly noted where initial settlements offered are far lesser than what you deserve. This is where our strong negotiation skills ensure you get optimal compensation without accepting less than what you deserve.

Located in Illinois, at Carlson Bier we stand as a pragmatic legal advisor holding solid experience in matters related to personal injury lawsuits and financial compensations that lawfully estimate your suffering’s accountability. We unequivocally understand every case is unique embodying different sets of details and hence our approach is tailored individually targeting each situation’s need for justice.

Ultimately, taking the first step towards laying out rightful claims may feel daunting but even during these stressful times – we are here to guide you throughout by providing unconditional support and clarity amidst uncertainties prevalent in Construction Site Accidents cases. Our adept team holds an impeccable success rate drawing from years of perseverance by prioritizing clients’ interests while keeping them consistently informed about their case progressions along with potential hurdles that might arise during litigation process.

Indeed, winning such cases can be difficult if unprepared or poorly represented. At Carlson Bier, we promise not just capable representation – but also compassion, understanding and utmost care ensuring a swift progression towards obtaining due justice bringing closure to this troublesome phase of your life.

If you or anyone close to you has suffered due to a construction site accident – time is crucial in preserving critical evidences that could vastly alter claims outcome. Therefore pause no more – click on the button below right now! Understand how much scope does your case hold within Illinois Jurisdiction through us… Uncover the true worth underlying your claim today and let us give direction to your action plan aimed at achieving a fair recompense justifying all hardships endured so far. Let today indeed mark the beginning of your journey towards justice with us at Carlson Bier by clicking that button below right now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Royalton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Royalton

Areas of Practice in Royalton

Bicycle Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering specialist legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing expert legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, supplying skilled legal assistance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Accidents: Committed to helping patients of car accidents secure fair recompense for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering experienced legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Focused on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in delivering specialized legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in supporting clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer