FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Saint Joseph

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you find yourself grappling with Products Liability issues in Saint Joseph, Carlson Bier is the strategic partner you need. As a distinguished law firm renowned for their special expertise in this niche area of personal injury law, they are fully equipped to shield your interests comprehensively. Their esteemed record of delivering desirable results consistently proves why Carlson Bier should be your top consideration when seeking representation for products liability cases. With astute knowledge and rigorous training under Illinois legislation, their attorneys aim not just to meet but surpass client expectations resonantly. Besides being dedicated experts driven by strong commitment to justice and fairness, they maintain an empathetic approach towards each case’s intricacies; understanding that no two cases can ever be identical. Working collaboratively with clients ensures a personalized strategy specific to each situation aiming always for optimal outcomes within the legal ambit thereon diligently handled.You can trust the name if it’s about Product Liability-attorney saga – It’s Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Saint Joseph Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we carry a noble banner of advocacy for those who have been injured due to products they trust and consume. As an established personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our principal goal is to ascertain that justice is served and your livelihood restored. We invite you into the world of Products Liability Law: it’s essence, facets, implications, and how it applies to ensuring your well-being.

Products Liability involves holding manufacturers, distributors, and vendors accountable for placing defective or harmful products into the hands of consumers. Such defects could be categorized into three types: manufacturing defects – flawed production process; design defects – inherently unsafe designs; marketing defects – inadequate warnings or instructions. Should you fall victim to any form of product negligence, seeking expert legal representation ensures rightful compensation.

Carlson Bier exhibits in-depth understanding and prowess handling product liability cases. With nuanced appreciation that each case carries its unique complexity tracing back to obligations set forth by ‘Restatement (Third) Torts: Products Liability,’ we intricately investigate every claim with aggressive precision:

• Establishing strict liability where there exists no significant requirement on the plaintiff/claimant to demonstrate negligence.

• Necessity for an actual defect when suing under design defect claims.

• Evaluating if manufacturers failed their duty to warn consumers about possible product risks.

Our team at Carlson Bier thrives not just on skill and experience but warmth followed by genuine commitment towards clients’ needs. You’re never just another case file – you are an individual deserving justice served righteously & swiftly.

Knowledge equips empowerment-sales contracts usually involve implied warranties ranging from fitness for specific purposes warranted by the manufacturer down to merchantability warranties stating products must meet standard quality expectations & functioning as intended aspirationally combined cutting across various statutes like Uniform Commercial Code or ‘UCC’. If such warranties while having suffered injuries due to defective operation-friendly & experienced professionals stand ready guiding alongside untangling intricate legalities involved.

It’s worth mentioning, Illinois Adopts the “Consumer Expectation” Test for Design Defects – In a crucial 2010 judgement, Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co., The Supreme Court of Illinois highlighted that both ‘consumer-expectation test’ and ‘risk-utility test’ can exist in actions over product-defective designs – precisely entailing context-depending adaptability thus demonstrating fairness in delivering justice ensuring consumer protection against defective design damages reasonably anticipated guarding your rights judiciously.

Prioritizing transparency & trust-building efforts decidedly at Carlson Bier renders strategised legal moves under delicate litigation circumstances surrounding Products Liability Law underscoring indispensably:

deciphering whether a defect originates within warranty’s duration (while it ought to be safeguarded); or

establishing element proving necessity seeking compensation claiming injuries due to defective products involving manufacturing /design defects giving birth to strict liability implications or demonstrating failure from manufacturer’s end warning consumers regarding product risks;

Your potential settlement could cover medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering or even punitive damages intended to penalize overly negligent or egregious behavior on part manufacturers/ merchandisers.

You deserve an unwavering legal ally ready to fight for your rights—a skilled personal injury attorney dedicated towards representing you fiercely presenting data-driven legal viewpoint with thorough commitment! Uncover the truth about your case—no stones left unturned—at Carlson Bier. We’re here to aid navigating murky waters restoring peace amid distress by reclaiming what rightfully belongs breaking away boundaries so you can heal as we get down fighting reaching towards light echeloning justice!

Remember—you are not alone. Team Carlson Bier stands firm beside emphasizing personalized attention transforming journey from victims towards victors because one victimized is one too many—we believe in deserving full recovery professionally & personally serving diligently accompanied assuring service-par-excellence working relentlessly regaining balanced normalcy disrupted life post such unfortunate incidents.

So, take the next vital step! Find out how much your product liability case could be worth. Click the button below—let Carlson Bier help you move from a place of injury and distress to a position of strength and victory. Because at Carlson Bier, justice isn’t just our profession—it’s personal.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Joseph Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Saint Joseph

Areas of Practice in Saint Joseph

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving expert legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending professional legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Tumble Incidents

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Crashes: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents get appropriate payout for wounds and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Collision

Offering professional legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for injuries.

Building Collisions

Committed to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Head Traumas

Specializing in extending dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440