Construction Site Accident Attorney in Scott Air Force Base

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve experienced a construction site accident, the specialized team at Carlson Bier is ready to take on your case. Welcoming clients from Scott Air Force Base and beyond, our proficient lawyers are firmly committed to fighting for you in the complex realm of personal injury law. Handling multiple dimensions of Construction Site Accident cases – including worker’s compensation claims, wrongful death suits, catastrophic injuries and more – we possess an unrivaled understanding of Illinois laws relevant to such matters. Backed by decades of experience and a reputation steeped in success stories, we serve victims like you relentlessly because we believe in justice first! We undertake thorough investigations into each situation bearing integrity at all fronts while ensuring clear communication with our clients throughout each step. At Carlson Bier- it’s not just about providing legal representation but also offering tremendous support during challenging times – this makes us stand out as a premier option when seeking a dedicated Construction Site Accident lawyer in Illinois state.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Scott Air Force Base Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities associated with construction site accidents. Encountering an injury in this type of environment can add additional complications to your situation due to various factors such as stringent regulations, overlapping operations and contract issues leading to a potentially intricate liability puzzle. As a personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we take pride in leveraging our extensive experience and profound understanding of personal injury law to guide victims through these complexities.

A plethora of hazards exist on construction sites that could lead to severe injuries or even death. For instance, you might find precarious scaffolding assemblies or unmarked openings—sites for potential falls. Crushing-injury risks lurk around heavy machinery areas while falling objects pose threats from above; there’s also a risk when working in confined spaces where harmful materials may be present without proper ventilation.

Remembering some crucial points can offer substantial help should you fall victim to a construction site accident:

– Never sign anything without legal representation: Certain parties might attempt coercing you into signing documents that could limit your claim ability.

– Document everything: Try capturing photographs at the scene if possible and keep every relevant medical report.

– Report the accident promptly: Reporting is often time-sensitive; it could even be within 24 hours post-incident.

Here at Carlson Bier, we understand how intimidating dealing with insurance adjusters and third-party administrators can get after encountering an accident. Their primary focus revolves around damage cost minimization — perhaps pushing victims towards accepting less than deserved compensation during chaotic moments post-accident.

Within this sphere involves liaising with Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA) officials whose function lies along enforcing laws regarding worker safety. Our well-rounded knowledge on OSHA standards also allows us to determine whether violation(s) occurred leading up till your injury phase.

We make concerted efforts ensuring clients receive deserving recompenses for damages suffered which usually include wage loss recovery, compensating for current/future medical bills besides catering for pain, suffering and other non-tangible damages.

In achieving this, our representation duties include:

– Determining liable parties.

– Evaluating claims fully to include present/future medical costs attached with loss of earning capabilities and impacts on general wellbeing.

– Aggressively arguing your case whether in courtrooms or settlement proceedings.

Remember, legal proceedings can consume considerable time especially when it comes to personal injuries within the construction industry—acting promptly could potentially influence your claim’s success.

So why choose Carlson Bier? We pride ourselves in offering personalized services blending compassionately with aggressive advocacy meant to secure deserved compensation amounts following personal injuries. Our tailored legal solutions prioritize individual needs using an approach geared towards optimal result delivery without compromising professional integrity standards.

Navigating through rigorous accident-induced circumstances requires representing attorneys who not only understand law intricacies but ones having a solid grasp on related matters like construction practices coupling skillfully with contract laws across varying bodies such judicial boards, labor unions plus insurance companies.

On entrusting us with representation rights, our commitment lies unwaveringly towards delivering justice for victims wronged by others’ negligence while ensuring peace restoration once again into disrupted areas of clients’ lives pertaining their physical health, financial security along emotional wellbeing.

Our vast experience portfolio allows beatable odds creation even against formidable entities. Don’t allow yourself becoming victimized twice over — initially by the accident aftermath then subsequently via monetary exploitation committed under the unprincipled guise of those mandated with providing aid during these tribulating times.

The journey towards rightful compensations begins with you finding out potential case worth based on specific situation evaluations. Click the button below acknowledging readiness in commencing this quest under most competent hands belonging exclusively at Carlson Bier – Your go-to choice amongst Illinois-based Personal Injury Attorneys!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Scott Air Force Base Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Scott Air Force Base

Areas of Practice in Scott Air Force Base

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending professional legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Providing specialist legal representation for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Tumble Incidents

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking justice for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents obtain equitable recompense for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Semi Collision

Delivering specialist legal assistance for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cognitive Injuries

Focused on delivering professional legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer