FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Scott Air Force Base

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For a reliable, competent, and skilled Products Liability attorney trusted by residents near Scott Air Force Base, turn to Carlson Bier. We specialize in personal injury law with an authentic interest in helping individuals who may be victims of defective or dangerous products. You deserve the best representation against large manufacturers accountable for producing harmful goods and we’re prepared to fight for you relentlessly. Our ultimate goal is fostering your peace of mind while obtaining favorable outcomes on every case. Experience matters when seeking justice; put our vast knowledge and prowess at protecting consumer rights into action for you now. Carlson Bier promises unwavering diligence throughout all aspects of your products liability claim process. As esteemed legal professionals, protecting clients from enormous corporations that failed in their duty to ensure public safety is what sets us apart from other attorneys handling this kind of law – so partner with us today! Opting for Carlson Bier means choosing dedicated support rooted in proficiency, experience and fierce advocacy throughout the entirety of Illinois state.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Scott Air Force Base Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted partner in Personal Injury law based right here in Illinois. We extensively specialize in multiple areas of Personal Injury law, one of which includes Products Liability. But what exactly is Products Liability? It’s a legal concept that holds manufacturers and sellers accountable for any defects or dangerous aspects of their products which have caused damage or harm to the consumer.

The realm of Products Liability may seem vast and complex, but we are here to navigate these waters on your behalf. Given our widespread expertise, we understand both the basics and nuances embedded within this area of legal proceedings.

• The first key aspect within Products Liability comes down to Defective Manufacture: if an aptly designed product suffers from a manufacturing error making it harmful – we can ardently fight for you.

• Equally important is the realm of Design Defects: even impeccably manufactured items can possess inherent design flaws leading to unforeseen injuries.

• Lastly but by no means least, Inadequate Warnings or Instructions: every item should come equipped with sufficient safety instructions; lack thereof could certainly fall under the umbrella of Product Liability.

With each individual case differing vastly, it becomes imperative that you seek professional assistance tailor-made towards your unique needs. This is where our proficient team at Carlson Bier steps in — not merely as lawyers but as dedicated advocates centered around providing justice.

A tangible value that sets us apart from others lies within our commitment towards education. We firmly believe in enabling victims with critical knowledge about their situation – transforming them from mere bystanders into active participants throughout their case proceedings. This empowerment serves dual benefits; helping ease anxieties while also ensuring transparency at all corners.

Undoubtedly though, this intricate subject raises crucial questions for all its complexity:

Would I require legal assistance only if physical injury has been sustained? Can psychological damages be grounds sufficient for legal action? How time-bound would this entire process be expected?

These potential inquiries might resonate within you, but rest assured – each query finds its credible clarification alongside Carlson Bier. Our in-depth consultation system ensures your every concern is thoroughly addressed.

You may wonder why it becomes so essential to have a dedicated team of Product Liability specialists on your side? The legislation we navigate can often be convoluted and overwhelming for the unseasoned eye yet second nature to our experts. We understand the minor caveats that could truly make or break your case. It’s through this understanding, combined with relentless dedication towards justice, that we emerge as tenacious allies ready to take up your cause.

As esteemed practitioners within Illinois legal boundaries, we maintain compliance with state-advertised laws affirming physical presence only at locations where our offices are established. However, rest assured no matter what corner of Illinois you reside in – once you’ve entrusted us with your responsibility; our dedication transcends geographical boundaries.

Finally, now that we’ve poured out all this valuable information about Products Liability and how Carlson Bier stands committed to delivering justice for victims entwined within it — you may also find yourself pondering about potential outcomes – specifics towards monetary compensation you would be entitled to.

We invite you to click on the button below which will whizz us over these details allowing one of our expert attorneys to evaluate them promptly. Let’s take this crucial step together in discovering not only an estimate of what lies at the end of this journey but building a resilient partnership determined on manifesting justice triumphantly! Claimants rarely regret taking action; regret often stems from paralysis due to lack of knowledge. Equip yourself robustly against such mishaps by aligning with those committed on embarking success together – Carlson Bier awaits your readiness!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Scott Air Force Base Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Scott Air Force Base

Areas of Practice in Scott Air Force Base

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving skilled legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering dedicated legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying specialist legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Trip Injuries

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal help for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents secure fair remuneration for harms and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Crash

Ensuring expert legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Expert in providing specialized legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in advocating for patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440