FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Sidney

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re seeking representation for a products liability case in Sidney, Carlson Bier is your premier choice. As an Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases, we employ attorneys who command extensive knowledge and experience when it comes to dealing with Products Liability law. Our legal team rigorously champions the rights of individuals injured due to defective or unsafe products. At Carlson Bier, we understand that such injuries can be life-altering – resulting in significant medical expenses and emotional trauma. To alleviate these burdens, we diligently press for maximum compensation on behalf of our clients while holding negligent manufacturers accountable for their actions. When choosing us as your legal representative, you get more than just a lawyer; you’ll gain access to proficient experts who have demonstrated superior case proficiency throughout numerous trials and settlements regarding faulty goods’ accidents within Illinois borders and beyond – providing unparalleled advocacy at every stage of proceedings.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Sidney Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re not just personal injury attorneys. We’re your dedicated allies and advocates in the face of hardship and trauma following a products-related accident. Based in Illinois, our legal team is seasoned with extensive experience handling all kinds of product liability cases. Despite our vast knowledge, however, we believe that educating you about this critical area of law is pivotal to equipping you with confidence and understanding during such difficult times.

Product Liability refers broadly to cases wherein consumers have been harmed by defective or hazardous products. Specialists at Carlson Bier crucially understand these complexities associated under three key categories:

• Defective manufacturing- This encompasses instances where a flaw in the production process makes a safe product dangerous.

• Defective design – Cases here detail unsafe designs inherent with the product itself even before manufacturing.

• Failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions – This category corresponds to clear risks linked further worsened by insufficient or non-existent cautionary descriptions or guidelines.

The diversity between these types calls for case-by-case examination from experienced professionals like us here at Carlson Bier. These types are not mutually exclusive; they may coexist and intertangle within a single case scenario requiring meticulous scrutiny for building compelling arguments.

Manufacturers owe consumers duty-of-care ensuring their safety isn’t compromised while using their products. Any breach inflicting unjust hardship empowers consumers supported by hard-hitting evidence to seek justice legally possible through compensatory damages—coverings costs associated with medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering relief, etcetera), or punitive damages (dissuading gross negligence on part of defendant).

It’s important that while navigating murky waters of both substantive laws and procedural rules characterizing Product Liability legislation in Illinois you won’t go alone having us as your staunch representatives seizing every miniscule opportunity aiding your cause driving towards rightful arbitration.

Despite all precautions being taken, if you’ve fallen victim to an incident involving faulty products, our proactive team at Carlson Bier is here to help. The statute of limitations for filing such a claim in Illinois extends up to two years from the date of injury discovery. Prompt and assertive actions heighten chances garnering maximum compensation your ordeal merits.

We value transparency and believe in continual client engagement. By turning to us you’re not only bolstering your legal recourse with unyielding defense, but also gaining a loyal partner transparent about all case dynamics every step throughout this challenging journey carving swift path towards justice retaining empathy and care guiding you out from chaos into calm.

Now, don’t let uncertainty about next steps keep you from pursuing rightful restitution oddly making the injustice sufferable. Stand tall against adversities assisted by dedicated assistance augmenting confidence even during most testing times powered by sound risk management techniques shouldering litigation responsibilities shedding unnecessary pressure off your shoulders within ambit of Illinois law restricting localized flouting marketing norms. Allow us, Carlson Bier’s learned pool personal injury lawyers ably standing guard advocating protecting what’s rightfully yours today legally armed facts negating counterclaims building solid case favorable resolution hardly distinguished among competition given resounding reputation built over rock-solid trust gained across clientele spanning various strata establishing singularly resilient law firm capable fighting daunting odds turning circumstances favorably benefitting clients fulfilling desired objectives aligned professional obligations maintaining highest ethical standards possibly attained demonstrating relentless pursuit achieving supreme level craftsmanship justifiable appreciation received duly cherished numerous satisfied customers reinforcing faith instilling motivation continuously serving distressed voices needing attention awareness raised cause getting justified importance deserved imbuing strength impacting positively standing steady still surmountable challenges appearing disheartened outset proving futile eventually successfully battled metaphysical strengths cherishing notable victories remarkable achievements gearing future ventures encapsulating range complexities simplifying legalized jargon unleashing relentless pursuit ensuring justice gets served reiterating belief stand by firmly unwavering commitment towards rescue mission focused clients’ interest foregoing else driving motivation behind endeavors propelling growth prosperity tandem simultaneously reinstating unwavering faith law’s might prevailing even most stringent testing times uprooting slightest dilution often rare incidence taking personal injury cases lying within purview peaceful resolution saving precious time, effort resources otherwise required unnecessarily prolonged trials avoided careful strategic planning cunning foresee optimizations performed case-by-case basis ascertaining best possible result hoped within given constraints exploring plausible alternatives nurturing intuitive innovative creative instincts lending penetrative astute sense towards turn events ushering exhilarating experiences memorable rendezvous clients’ embrace reminiscing pleasant memories soothed past anguish celebrated new chapters written promising future offerings ripe benefits unexpected bonuses part fulfilling journey culminating into mutual admiration respect reciprocated endearing camaraderie cherished forever.

Let Carlson Bier assume command of your legal battle equipping it with resilience powered by in-depth research and vigorous advocacy. We invite you to determine the value potential of your case using our online tool located just a click away below. Legal representation shouldn’t be an overwhelming choice – we’re here to ensure it isn’t. Armed with clarity and confidence, take that empowering step today toward identifying what your personal injury case is really worth…because at Carlson Bier, you matter completely.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sidney Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Sidney

Areas of Practice in Sidney

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing skilled legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Incompetence

Providing expert legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal support to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Fall Injuries

Expert in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal help for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding sufferers of car accidents secure just payout for injuries and harm.

Bike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to offering compassionate legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on defending individuals with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440