FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in South Barrington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a product defect ordeal can be stressful, hence the need for an accomplished Products Liability attorney. Carlson Bier emerges as an impeccable choice matching this criterion. Our firm boasts exceptional prowess in handling complex liability cases involving defective and dangerous products, using our vast experience in Illinois law to work tirelessly for rightful compensation on behalf of our clients. We provide top-notch legal representation uniquely tailored to revolve around your needs. At Carlson Bier, we truly believe that manufacturers should be held accountable if their negligence or incompetence results in preventable harm due to defective goods sold — we firmly stand up against such noncompliance within South Barrington community’s interest parameters at heart! Distinctive from others by utilizing case-specific approaches and relentless commitment exemplified in every task we undertake; choosing us implies trusting a team dedicated towards ensuring justice prevails above corporate greed and negligence: thus making us as the ideal consideration when seeking expert Products Liability legal representation amidst any challenging scenario — choose Carlson Bier for responsive, competent advocacy.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in South Barrington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in the practice of personal injury law with a particular focus on Products Liability. As an experienced law firm based in Illinois, our commitment to serving clients with both dedication and integrity is unrivaled. When you or your loved ones have been wrongfully injured as a result of a defective or dangerous product, we stand ready to step in, armed with knowledge and the power of the legal system.

Product liability refers to holding manufacturers and sellers responsible for placing defective or harm-inducing products into consumers’ hands which consequently leads to unexpected injuries or damages. These scenarios manifest in three key ways:

– Manufacturing defects: Occasionally products become hazardous during their creation due to negligence or simple error.

– Design defects: Sometimes the flaw lies within a product’s design making it unsafe even when manufactured according to specification.

– Failure to provide adequate warnings: If potential dangers aren’t communicated clearly and adequately on labels, instructions, or packaging.

Carlson Bier leverages years of experience dealing with such cases involving Product Liability laws thus helping individuals secure justice and fair compensation for suffered losses. Our team explores all avenues for legal action whilst offering comprehensive support from initial consultation right up until the final settlement.

With regard to the claims process under Products Liability Law, expect diligent pursuit while ensuring you understand every step being undertaken. We start by meticulously evaluating your case details then proceed towards collecting necessary evidence – be it photographs of the product that caused damage; testimonies from designers, manufacturers or fellow users; and any related medical documentation linking your injuries directly back towards said product use.

Just as crucial as understanding why our services are remarkably effective is knowing what separates us from others – we meticulously demonstrate how defendant’s breach in duty lying at heart of Personal Injury law results in foreseeable harm thereby presenting a foolproof claim on behalf our client victims enduring untold suffering from benignly purchased but dangerously supplied goods.

It must also be emphasized that time holds great importance in filing such suits. Illinois law imposes stringent time limits – known as statutes of limitations – for initiating product liability claims, typically within two years from the moment injury is discovered or should have been discovered. Hence, delay in choosing to act may compromise your right to adequate compensation.

Moreover, we work on a contingency fee basis – meaning you pay us no legal fees unless we win your case, thus risk remains entirely ours while recovery becomes solely about you.

At Carlson Bier, our paramount endeavor remains asserting contention between negligent supply and debilitating result whilst unwaveringly supporting affected individuals via diligent advocacy. Finely attuned to intricate detail and proficient expertise within Products Liability sector confidently reassures your best interests will always be decidedly defended under our representation.

As an option always open to anyone facing Product Liability issues in Illinois: Make use of the button below to determine precisely how much your case could potentially be worth. Our hassle-free case evaluation tool affords insight into practical processes ahead while also providing prospective clients with peace-of-mind through transparent assessment breakdowns completely free of charge.

It is never too early nor too late with Carlson Bier – We await you! Secure what’s rightfully yours today: Click the button below now and take that first step towards justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Barrington Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in South Barrington

Areas of Practice in South Barrington

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying professional legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Misconduct

Extending expert legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents get just recompense for damages and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Harms

Expert in offering expert legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440