FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in South Elgin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a products liability issue, the urgency to find an attorney who presents both authority and depth of understanding cannot be overstated. Carlson Bier is one such firm known for its rigorous pursuit of justice on behalf of those impacted by faulty or dangerous products. Armed with extensive experience in Illinois state laws surrounding product liability, our attorneys bring exceptional knowledge, razor-sharp strategic acumen and a passion for client advocacy to every case we handle. These are qualities that make us stand out as a top choice for residents grappling with such legal predicaments. Our unwavering commitment to conducting thorough investigations stands testament to our dedication towards securing optimal outcomes for people entangled in these complex issues. Choosing Carlson Bier means entrusting your legal journey into consummate hands proficient at navigating product liability cases effectively and efficiently – even when things get tough… Particularly then! As seasoned products liability lawyers, we deliver tailored solutions aimed at meeting individuals’ unique needs because here at Carlson Bier; it’s not about us, it’s about you!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in South Elgin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that understanding the intricacies of Products Liability can often seem daunting. As a premier law firm specializing in personal injury cases and dedicated advocates for victims of defective products, it’s our mission to clarify this complex area of law.

Products liability refers to holding manufacturers or sellers legally liable when a product is found defective or harmful. Our aim at Carlson Bier is not only to fight for the justice you deserve but also equip you with knowledge about your rights as consumers under Illinois’ Product Liability Law.

• Dangerous defects that may be present in a product range from design flaws to manufacturing mistakes or failure in providing adequate instructions for use. If any such defect has led to an injury, it falls under the purview of Products Liability.

• The Illinois court systems consider three types of defects: Design Defects, Manufacturing Defects and Marketing Defects

Accountability is not confined merely to manufacturers; retailers too are implicated under this law if they sold a defective product knowingly. This means anyone along the supply chain – from suppliers, distributors, wholesalers and even retailers – could potentially be held responsible for selling a faulty item leading to an accident occurrence affecting one’s health/adverse injuries sustained by users.

Whether you’re dealing with home appliances, medical devices, automotive parts or other consumer goods, every aspect matters when pursuing legal action. It’s crucial to substantiate evidence proving that:

• You utilized the product as intended.

• The defect was solely responsible for inflicting your injuries.

• A direct correlation exists between usage and resulting harm.

Our highly experienced team at Carlson Bier conducts impeccable investigations into claims brought forth by clients and works relentlessly with experts in their respective fields yielding comprehensive reports backing up these requirements.

We take pride in maintaining an open channel communication policy where we listen carefully before crafting tailored strategies aimed at securing optimal outcomes independent of whether settling happens through negotiations outside courtrooms or litigation process inside them.

Please remember, in the intricate maze of Products Liability laws, time is not just money but often equates to justice. Illinois has Statutes of Limitations restricting the timeframe during which one may file a legal action for such personal injuries caused due to product defects. Delaying it may affect or even nullify the prospects in recuperating damages rightfully you are entitled to.

Many people find themselves overwhelmed by medical bills and lost wages after being hurt by a defective product. It’s not just about navigating complex legal systems; at Carlson Bier, we realize that with each client, human stories interweave within every case dealt with personally and professionally assuring you’re heard, helped and hopeful moving forward.

You might still have many questions looming large related to understanding how Product liability operates in Illinois. Rest assured knowing we’re here as your trusted advocates delivering responsive service & reliable information all aimed towards guaranteeing your peace of mind securing the compensation deserved toward balancing life back on track post injury.

The final step – now – involves seeking valuable assistance right away; ensuring best possible outcome rests on swift professional intervention besides crucial evidence preservation bearing pivotal influence when lawsuits get filed against responsible entities involved during supply chains contributing towards harmful products reaching markets detrimental risking consumer wellbeing.

While this page offers informative content designed for easy comprehension, only so much can be included without overloading readers with unnecessary jargon or detailed scenarios beyond this scope. For comprehensively personalized insight based specifically upon individual circumstances surrounding potential claims clients may possess – CLICK ON THE BUTTON BELOW NOW to understand ‘how much could my case potentially be worth’. Our dedicated team remains eager assisting jederzeit (anytime), competently exploring each aspect pertinent providing invaluable guidance towards achieving expedited resolution backed proven expertise from Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys working tirelessly representing aggrieved parties whose lives got upended due manufacture/selling faulty items causing preventable injuries regain dignity, financial stability & mental calmness amidst troubled times embracing adversities thrust upon unwillingly alleviating worries lifting stress facilitating steady strides toward recuperation & rejuvenation.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Elgin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in South Elgin

Areas of Practice in South Elgin

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Giving professional legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal assistance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents get appropriate payout for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Crash

Providing adept legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for harms.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to offering expert legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to defending patients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440