FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Sparta

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a construction site accident in Sparta, Illinois, experienced guidance is crucial. Carlson Bier specializes in Construction Site Accident law and can provide the necessary legal advice and representation. This firm boasts an exceptional track record of successful settlements and verdicts for individuals afflicted by serious injuries or accidents on building sites. The seasoned team at Carlson Bier understands that such incidents not only affect your wellbeing but may also influence your financial stability due to medical bills or missed work days. With diligent investigation skills coupled with strong litigation experience, our lawyers aim to yield maximum compensation for their clients’ distress promptly and efficiently. Furthermore, we emphasize open communication facilitating comprehensive understanding of each case’s process while acquainting clients with their rightful claims effectively. Our proficiency lies in handling complex lawsuits relating to device defects, negligence practices as well as violations of safety regulations that might occur on the worksite leading toward disastrous consequences – making us a sensible choice when seeking expert Construction Site Accident legal assistance based within Illinois state laws.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Sparta Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated team of personal injury attorneys serving the state of Illinois with high-quality, legal services in the realm of Construction Site Accidents. Our extensive experience sets us apart as leading advocates for individuals who have suffered harm due to construction site mishaps and negligence.

In the bustling world of construction sites, safety must be paramount. Unfortunately, incidents often occur in these spaces that can result in significant injuries or even severe loss for workers or bystanders alike. These situations could arise from a broad spectrum of causes such as machinery malfunctioning, structural falling, or inadequate protective measures being employed amongst others.

Some key contributing factors to construction site accidents include:

• Incorrect Equipment Utilization: Machinery and tools on-site must be adequately managed and used correctly to prevent any harmful circumstances.

• Improper Safety Measures: From hard hats to harnesses, certain standards should be upheld to ensure maximum protection within the workplace.

• Structural Collapse: Proper inspections need to be done regularly on constructed structures to circumvent risks of collapse causing grave injuries.

• Worker Fatigue: Overworked personnel prove more susceptible to making mistakes or misjudgments leading to potential accidents.

Understanding your rights is crucial when involved in an accident at a construction site. At Carlson Bier, we strive not just towards litigation and compensation claims but also focus on delivering comprehensive guidance throughout this process.

Workers’ compensation may cover some losses experienced by an individual caught in a construction accident; however, it might not cater wholly for long-term undue hardships faced post-accident nor those inflicted on bystanders. That’s where our specialized personal injury law expertise comes into play – helping decipher complexities and build strong cases grounded within Illinois’ legal framework ensuring rightful justice served.

Our approach revolves around tackling every case with personalized care, prioritizing each client’s unique needs and specific circumstances which is integral while maneuvering through detailed insurance processes successfully. We embark upon thorough investigations spearheaded by our seasoned attorneys to uphold your claim substantively with the full force of the law behind you.

While no amount can truly measure up to the physical and emotional toll an accident imparts, ensuring fair monetary alleviation is vital. At Carlson Bier, we endeavour towards maximum compensation recovery that accounts for medical expenses, lost wages, future financial needs and pain suffered.

We acknowledge that navigating through this process might seem overwhelming. That’s why we’re here to assist every step of the way – From understanding your situation in-depth, charting out a targeted legal plan and advocating fiercely on your behalf both in or out of courtroom environments.

Being represented by accomplished attorney consultants such as us exponentially increases your chances at receiving rightful restitution compared to going it alone. Our reputation precedes us via a proven track record demonstrating successful case outcomes due to strategic negotiations with insurance companies or proactive persistence within courts when needed.

While physically located in Illinois, we are not limited exclusively within this boundary but cater across other locales as well. However, kindly note that we adhere strictly to regulations prohibiting false declarations about our location specifics; hence any insinuations regarding Mr.Bier as a ‘personal lawyer in Sparta’ or suggestions pointing towards an office located there would be erroneous and against Illinois law.

Your journey towards achieving justice doesn’t have to be daunting when you work with an expert firm like Carlson Bier! Click on the button below now – Let’s find out together how much your case may potentially be worth while simultaneously lightening this burden from your shoulders significantly.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sparta Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Sparta

Areas of Practice in Sparta

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering skilled legal advice for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal assistance for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal support to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Slip Incidents

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Crashes

Crashes: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents get fair remuneration for wounds and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Delivering adept legal support for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Committed to offering expert legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440