Construction Site Accident Attorney in Texico

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate incidents take place at construction sites in Texico, you need an assertive advocate to support your claim. Carlson Bier, the eminent personal injury lawyer group, specializes in handling construction site accidents with precision and prowess. Their team of highly skilled attorneys has consistently delivered judgements favorable to their clients by adeptly navigating through the complex legal processes involved. With vast experience managing intricate cases related to worksite injuries and civil lawsuits against contractors or homeowner insurance providers, they bring a unique edge that is highly valuable for your case’s success. Choosing Carlson Bier means investing trust in a firm recognized for its exceptional service ethos, relentless efforts towards protecting client rights and ensuring maximum compensation under Illinois law. They pride themselves on offering comprehensive case evaluation reflecting their unparalleled commitment towards obtaining deserved justice for victims of construction site mishaps across cities served including but not limited to Texico. Remember – when the worst happens on-site: Call Carlson Bier – Your greatest ally seeking resolute protection under Illinois law.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Texico Illinois

Welcome to the law firm of Carlson Bier, your premier destination for personal injury legal services in Illinois. Our focus lies primarily on Construction Site Accident Claims, a niche that requires intricate knowledge and experience. Let us guide you through some fundamental elements related to these types of accident claims.

In any construction site area, precautionary measures are mandated by state and federal laws to ensure the safety of all staff members. Despite this, accidents often occur due to potential hazards like falling materials or equipment misuse. The injuries sustained from such accidents can be severe; sometimes leading to chronic conditions or fatal complications.

Understanding Workers’ Compensation is vital when dealing with construction site injuries. It’s designed as insurance to safeguard employees by providing medical expense coverage along with wage replacement throughout recovery periods. However, it may not fully meet your financial needs considering possible long-term effects of the injury.

Here at Carlson Bier, our skilled attorneys are specialists in navigating complex cases involving catastrophic injuries like spinal cord damage or traumatic brain injury commonly associated with heavy machinery operations and falling objects at construction sites. We strive relentlessly:

• To secure fair compensation beyond standard Workers’ Compensation benefits.

• To scrutinize every detail that could substantiate your claim ─ including inadequate training and equipment usage violations, poor site maintenance, outdated policies which disregard operational safety parameters.

• To advocate strongly if a third party’s negligence contributed towards your accident.

Potential damages available for victims go beyond medical expenses: loss earnings during your incapacitation period, future wage loss should the injury limit your ability to work effectively in the long term; pain and suffering introduced by physical trauma; non-economic punitive damages when employer/insurer actions portray malicious intent.

Negligence remains pivotal in personal injury claims – proving an entity did not perform its expected duty contributing directly or indirectly towards an incident causing significant harm under reasonable preventability circumstances. Even passersby injured near construction sites can file lawsuits seeking compensation for their losses from responsible parties.

Illinois operates under a modified comparative fault system ─ even if your actions contributed to the accident, you can still secure compensation for your losses. That’s provided you bear less than 51% of the blame in that incident. We understand nitty-gritty legal intricacies and will guide you effectively on such matters.

At Carlson Bier, we believe every worker is entitled to safe working conditions and proper redress when this right is violated. Whether it’s battling insurance adjusters who are seeking ways to minimize their payout or standing up against negligent employers, our personal injury attorneys focus on getting justice for victims of construction site accidents.

Opting for litigation can be an arduous journey, but having experienced lawyers advocating passionately on your side makes all the difference as they strive relentlessly towards ensuring fair treatment and adequate compensation.

Trust us with your concerns! It’s time to leverage our extensive expertise; unravel the complexities surrounding personal injury law, especially those linked with Construction Site Accidents; overcome obstacles possibly posed by other involved entities – all geared towards securing justice optimal outcome!

We would like to encourage you now – take a moment to click on the button below and find out how much your case could potentially be worth. As renowned personal injury attorneys within Illinois, we at Carlson Bier stand ready to provide unwavering support when it comes to navigating this challenging period in your life. Legal complexities don’t have to complicate things further while you should primarily focus on recovery instead of worrying about compensatory aspects related closely with incurred injuries through no-fault situations at work sites.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Texico Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Texico

Areas of Practice in Texico

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Proficient in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing adept legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending experienced legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, extending expert legal support to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Fall Accidents

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for wounds and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Committed to advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer