Construction Site Accident Attorney in Toluca

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a construction site accident, you need an assertive, experienced attorney on your side. Carlson Bier has built a stalwart reputation in handling these complex cases successfully. Our attorneys are experts in navigating through intricacies related to construction hazards as they mastered unearthing malpractices or negligence that might easily go unnoticed by others. We assist clients through aggressive representation to ensure maximum compensation for their losses and injuries while minimizing their stress during recovery. In Toluca’s fast-paced construction industry, understanding Illinois laws is imperative; that’s where Carlson Bier excels. We excel due to our specialized knowledge about regulations applicable within Illinois state borders and dedication towards our clientele regardless of their location within the region . Choosing us means assured commitment till justice is served – individuals who experienced setbacks because of another party’s irresponsibility should not bear its outcomes alone or unsupported,and this is why we believe choosing Carlson Bier can make all the difference in your case

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Toluca Illinois

When it comes to construction site accidents, the wealth of legal complexities can leave one feeling overwhelmed and unsure of how to proceed. At Carlson Bier, a preeminent personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we specialize in guiding victims through their legal journey with the utmost skill, determination, and empathy. Accidents at construction sites unfortunately occur all too often due to a variety of reasons such as unsafe working conditions, improper use or lack of safety equipment or negligent supervision.

As your trusted counsel, we primarily address four crucial perspectives related to construction site accident cases. Firstly recklessness on part of anyone involved can make for a strong case. Secondarily work-related injuries that result from an employer’s negligence might be applicable under workers’ compensation laws. Thirdly faulty equipment can give rise to product liability claims and Lastly third-party negligence where another party could have contributed to the cause of an act leading to harm is taken into account.

Our expert teams understand that every case presents unique challenges so we develop individual tailored strategies for each client’s situation Nevertheless key aspects including assessing the extent & nature of injuries caused are constant themes which are addressed aggressively from day one Thereby ensuring we strive for maximum settlements while bearing our clients comfort in mind This includes relevant immediate medical costs future treatment expenses lost earning capacity punitive damages mental anguish pain & suffering

Carlson Bier prides itself on its vast research capabilities coupled with seasoned expertise We delve deep into every aspect leaving no stone unturned Our goal is ensuring justice by holding liable parties accountable but equally imparting empowerment through self-restoration Every victim deserves dignity respect acknowledgement that what happened was wrong Hence our relentless quest for obtaining financial recompense also reflects our unwavering commitment towards restoring the lives impacted

We understand litigation is perceived as harrowing But rest assured our team walks you through each step setting accurate expectations keeping you informed throughout ensuring transparency While there are numerous factors impacting claim value some precedent matters do pave certain guidelines e.g. when multiple parties are liable distributed among them can be the compensation based on their degree of fault Furthermore if a victim is also somewhat responsible claim value might get influenced hence our proactive approach in preserving evidence essential for rebutting comparatives

Our aim at Carlson Bier isn’t just limited to successfully representing you within court confines. We seek to create lifelong relationships by prioritizing your needs, safeguarding your interests and navigating alongside through this tumultuous journey called life post-accident consolidated into comprehensive holistic services rendered with unflinching dedication compassion care As we work in synergy answers will unfold uncertainties will dissolve secure paths towards meaningful resolution emerge

Through expertise ingrained over years countless stories defined by successful redressal countless lives touched & transformed – your ideal partner during these trying periods lies ahead At Carlson Bier our mission goes beyond acquiring justice or winning litigation It’s about equal measures of kindness understanding diligence perseverance impeccably fused together with empathy

Taking these factors into consideration, it’s imperative that anyone who has been involved in a construction site accident takes immediate action to protect their rights and potential claims. If you feel burdened by questions like “When should I initiate proceedings?” or “How much is my case worth?” allow us to shoulder these concerns for you so that you can focus on what truly matters – healing and recovery.

Click the button below now! To Find out how much your case could be worth while assuring peace of mind knowing that competent seasoned experts stand dedicated towards relentlessly chasing justice for making right the wrong inflicted For establishing truth reiterating humanity’s inherent resilience enabling vibrant regrowth following disarray Allow yourself trust Believe in beginnings yet again Experience Carlson Bier where everyday we successfully endeavor turning victims into victorious survivors restoring peace replacing distress paving bright futures from paths steeped in darkness

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Toluca Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Toluca

Areas of Practice in Toluca

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering skilled legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Extending professional legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal help to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Malpractice

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Stumble Incidents

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Offering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to helping patients of car accidents receive equitable settlement for damages and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Ensuring professional legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Dedicated to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in delivering professional legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer