FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Vienna

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Renowned for their dedication to justice, Carlson Bier is a trusted name in Products Liability law. Servicing the needs of individuals wrongly harmed by defective products, our team devotes relentless energy and expertise to every case we undertake. Navigating the complex terrain of product liability becomes straightforward as our attorneys effectively facilitate compensation claims for injuries or losses suffered due to faulty manufacturing or inadequate warnings on goods. At Carlson Bier, clients benefit enormously from representation rooted in comprehensive knowledge about unique regional nuances specifically found within Vienna settings and circumstances that could influence cases significantly. Whether you’re dealing with defective machinery at work or encountered hazardous household items leading to personal damage, rest assured knowing your case is handled with utmost diligence; underpinned by fierce advocacy towards achieving favorable results for all impacted parties involved. Being an ethical firm committed ardently towards ensuring client welfare takes ultimate precedence over everything else; choosing us promises not just competent legal support but also accordance grounded in genuine empathy and understanding. Choose Carlson Bier today – your best consideration when considering a Products Liability lawyer.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Vienna Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on providing high-quality legal services dedicated to personal injury law, with a focus particularly on Product Liability. Based in Illinois, our expert attorneys are armed with a blend of deep understanding and extensive experience in this field of law. We continually strive to bring knowledge and value available for your needs.

Products liability is an area of the law that holds manufacturers accountable for their products when defects or flaws pose harm or lead to injuries for consumers. The essence of this legal niche is rooted deeply in consumer protection, working aggressively to ensure that all goods entering the market are safe for use. Falling under the umbrella of personal injury claims, product liability cases require specialized expertise like those offered by our team at Carlson Bier who have years of industry success forcefully advocating for clients’ rights against large corporations.

There are three main types of product faults that can give rise to a viable lawsuit:

• Design Defects: These occur when there’s an inherent flaw or danger in the design itself.

• Manufacturing Defects: Here, though the design might be safe, errors during manufacturing process render it dangerous.

• Failure-to-Warn Defects: This entails lack of suitable instructions or warnings about possible risks linked with usage.

These classifications often form the foundation upon which successful litigations are built across different faulty goods—be it children’s toys, power tools, automobiles or pharmaceutical drugs. Yes! Pharmaceuticals too! You may not know but defective drug lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies come under guise of Product Liability Law.

It’s also noteworthy that each category’s complex nature requires significant evidence including proving causal connection between defect and damage suffered which some may find overwhelming without professional aid – this exactly what you’ll get at Carlson Bier where we leave no stone unturned throughout investigation phase until desired result court has been achieved!

Liability laws differ from state to state; Illinois operates under strict liability rules where entities involved in the chain of manufacturing and distribution can be held accountable for injuries caused without necessarily having to prove their negligence. The Illinois Product Liability Act provides consumers with the necessary protection whilst the legal obligation tied to fault finds applicability throughout other states.

Discovering a defective product situation may initially seem disappointing or even intimidating- confronting large manufacturers isn’t for faint hearted – but this is where Carlson Bier steps forth as your legal shield, determinedly aiming redressal and rightful compensation you deserve. We understand how adversely such unfortunate instances could impact daily life consequently driving each case with sincere commitment under professional guidance backed by extensive expertise our team brings table led by senior members who have garnered recognition within industry over years service

We earnestly believe in demystifying law, carving out strategic routes while keeping optimal outcomes integral differential point. While discussing your case with us, think not of it as an interaction between a lawyer-and-client; rather view it as advice from a trusted friend alert on your best interests at every step.

Don’t merely envision justice against wrongdoers; actualize it confidently alongside us while we champion resilience amidst corporate complexities! Want to know what compensation awaits down road? Just below this page you’ll find button marked“Find Out How Much Your Case Worth”. Go ahead click on that – make first step towards phasing uncertainty out claim process into promising opportunity restitution with support one leading personal injury attorneys Illinois has offer: Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vienna Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Vienna

Areas of Practice in Vienna

Bike Accidents

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Supplying professional legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, extending professional legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal assistance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on helping clients of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal support for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Crash

Providing expert legal representation for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Harm

Focused on defending individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440