Construction Site Accident Attorney in Virginia

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a construction site accident can be overwhelming, not just physically but also emotionally and financially. If you find yourself in such a tough circumstance, Carlson Bier is your reliable partner in navigating the complexities of construction injury law claims. As an illustrious personal injury law firm based out of Illinois, we pride ourselves on our dedication, prowess, and unparalleled expertise in handling numerous Construction Site Accident cases across various jurisdictions including Virginia. When it comes to these specific types of accidents at worksites – involving heavy machinery or contractor negligence among others – experience counts immensely; Carlson Bier confidently assures that advantage to our clients. Remember this: not every attorney thoroughly grasps intricacies like OSHA standards or workers compensation laws as adeptly as we do here at Carlson Bier. Over countless successful cases handled for our clients across America including Virginia attest to these facts about us – nothing impacts more than results when seeking justice for your unique situation. Trust only the best with Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Virginia Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that construction site accidents often result in serious personal injuries. With our expertise as personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, it is our mission to provide the necessary legal support for victims of such unfortunate incidents. Accidents occur daily on construction sites, ranging from minor cuts and abrasions to more severe consequences including loss of limbs, traumatic brain injuries, and sometimes even fatality. Some causes can be attributed to equipment malfunction, failure to use appropriate safety measures or simply human error.

Undeniably, the aftermath of a construction site accident can be incredibly distressing both physically and emotionally. Speaking with insurance companies while still attempting to recover can feel like an insurmountable task which is where we come into play with utmost dedication. At Carlson Bier lawyer group, focusing on personal recovery becomes your number one priority while securing compensation becomes ours—we become instrumental during these trying times ensuring you cut through bureaucratic red tape quickly.

• Thorough investigation: We delve deep into the circumstances surrounding each case—inspecting machinery involved if present, speaking with eye-witnesses etc.—to gather every bit of relevant evidence.

• Calculating damages: This involves assessing medical expenses (present and future), lost wages due to inability to work after the incident alongside other financial losses accrued.

• Negotiating settlements: We persistently fight insurance companies who habitually attempt under-compensation thus safeguarding your entitlements robustly.

• Representing clients at trial: If no reasonable settlement offer surfaces even after lengthy negotiations transpire then representation at court becomes a vital service provided by us.

The responsibilities falling on employers or contractors towards maintaining safe working environments are precise but occasionally fall short entailing adverse outcomes. Understanding employer duties—which include ensuring properly trained personnel’s presence; maintaining up-to-date equipment usage to minimize accident risks; regularly inspecting equipment for malfunctions; complying with pertinent regulations set forth by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)—can be a complex process, hence affirming the necessity for appropriate representation by experienced lawyers such as those at Carlson Bier.

Being involved in construction site accidents often seem overwhelming but know we are here to provide support every step of the way. Our tenacious dedication towards achieving justice and compensation on your behalf underlines our very ethos. Remember, you do not have to go through this alone.

Let us worry about navigating these complexities—time barred filing deadlines, entangling insurance company exchanges or medical bill stressors—for you. What’s more valuable than understanding what is owed to you after going through one of life’s most traumatic experiences?

At Carlson Bier law firm—we believe ardently that anyone injured deserves comprehensive reparation and we work tirelessly to ensure just resolutions equaling fair compensations. Remember—the clock starts ticking as soon as an accident occurs—it’s absolutely vital that early steps are taken in order for evidence preservation alongside securing witnesses testimonies—as delay can greatly hinder chances of successful claim submissions.

With outstanding case results mirroring our meticulous approach having resulted in desirable settlements for countless clients over many years; needless to say you’ll be in capable hands with us at your side throughout this ordeal. We genuinely care about helping individuals unfairly caught up in unwarranted circumstances arising out of other party’s negligence—so allow us the privilege of advocating on your behalf ensuring all your rights preserved diligently during these trying times.

Every situation changes undoubtedly when it comes to personal injury cases so why not discover exactly how much could potentially be claimed specifically regarding your accident? Simply utilize our online evaluation form below providing brief, basic details relating directly with your individual case—you won’t even need to leave home! Without any financial obligations whatsoever–there really is nothing left causing hesitations therefore why wait any longer? Start now by clicking the button below entitled ‘Evaluate My Case’. Since because who knows? Your validation might just lie a click away with potential compensation altering your life’s trajectory permanently. Trust Carlson Bier for what it rightfully deserves today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Virginia Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Virginia

Areas of Practice in Virginia

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying specialist legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing experienced legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Committed to guiding individuals of car accidents receive appropriate recompense for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Building Crashes

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in offering specialized legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Committed to advocating for patients with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer