FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Waverly

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate incidents resulting from defective products arise, Carlson Bier stands as the leading choice for a Products Liability attorney group in Illinois. Boasting decades of success, our track record speaks to our exceptional prowess in handling complex cases with dedicated professionalism and unmatched competence. Our understanding of Illinois law is comprehensive and detailed, enabling us to navigate each case strategically and effectively. As specialists in Products Liability law, we rigorously fight for victims who suffer injuries inflicted by manufacturers’ negligence or faulty goods production. Carlson Bier’s distinguished reputation resonates beyond borders—we emphasize ensuring justice regardless of where you reside—because everyone deserves world-class representation! Unwavering commitment to clients coupled with an aggressive approach towards pursuing your rights defines every aspect of service delivery at Carlson Bier. Embedded within Waverly’s community fabric remotely yet decisively empowering local residents against manufacturer malfeasance – teammates at afar but trusted lawyers at heart – Carlson Bier distinguishes itself as an invaluable partner when pursuing a fair resolution in any Product Liabilities legal dispute.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Waverly Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your reliable personal injury attorney group based in Illinois. Our firm specializes in navigating complex products liability cases, focusing on representing you with the utmost integrity and a commitment for securing justice. Your experience as a victim of a faulty product should not further be compounded by legal troubles; we are here to shoulder that burden so you can focus on recovering.

In essence, products liability refers to holding manufacturers or sellers legally responsible for placing defective or dangerous goods into the consumers’ hands; it’s a breach of implied trust between the buyer and seller. Oftentimes, such claims fall within three varieties: manufacturing defects, design defects and failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions about how to safely use the product.

• Manufacturing defect occurs when there’s an error during production, causing an otherwise safe product to become harmful.

• Design defects imply that even though there is no flaw in its actual creation process, inherent flaws in its blueprint present danger.

• A case could also arise from absence of appropriate warnings highlighting potential risks associated with using the product.

Carlson Bier takes pride in their proficiency over these myriad elements involved in Products Liability law – our skilled attorneys meticulously comb through every nuance ensuring we frame the most compelling case tailored specifically for you.

Illinois statutory laws governs that if an individual is injured because of negligence on part of manufacturer/seller- they must be held accountable. Actions brought against them are often placed under strict liability rules – meaning victims only need prove that they have been harmed by said merchandise without needing evidence of carelessness. An important facet unique Illinois law pertains to “Modified Comparative Negligence”; this means if plaintiff holds more than 50% share in contributing towards accident then compensation might be denied completely- exonerating defendant off any blame whatsoever!

Teaming up with Carlson Bier empowers you with access to professional resources instrumental for building sturdy defenses; uncovering key evidences critical for establishing liability. Our accomplished lawyers proactively leverage their skills and groundbreaking legal tools to uncover concrete evidences – leaving no stone unturned in the process of defending your rights. Our personal injury attorney also dedicates significant attention towards appreciating multi-level complexities mirrored within Products Liability cases, patiently preparing you for any unlikely contingencies.

At Carlson Bier, we ambitiously uphold an empathetic approach prioritizing open communication and fostering strong attorney-client relationships. We are committed to considering every subtle aspect of your case; ensuring you don’t look back feeling any part of your story went unheard or was undervalued. This intricate understanding coupled with our robust negotiation capabilities have consistently steered us towards maximizing settlements on behalf of our clients, time and again.

Multiple layers converging into products liability claims often instigate scenarios replete with high stakes – understandably these can be intimidating! Make a note though, under Illinois law timeframe within which such lawsuits must be filed- a.k.a Statute Of Limitations is two years from moment one realizes injuries from defective product: paragraphs like this ensure you aren’t taken off guard!

Elevating knowledge about products liability makes formidable step in obtaining justice that rightfully belongs to you – we hope this information serves valuable comprehension about the same. Upholding mission to deliver highest standard deserves nothing less than steadfast dedication reflected through Carlson Bier ethos

Your struggle is legitimate and legal recourse exists at disposal spearheaded by experts willing battle till finish line. Is not it worth exploring options ahead? Discover how much your case could potentially be worth by clicking on the button below because just around corner might lie powerful solution bringing closer that closure rightfully yours. After all, when pertinent questions hover over horizon-answers too shouldn’t be far behind! So click away-take proactive steps lead way!

Let Carlson Bier help you ascertain rightful compensation for your ordeal without further delay!!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Waverly Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Waverly

Areas of Practice in Waverly

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying expert legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal advice for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Slip Incidents

Specialist in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents secure just settlement for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Extending experienced legal advice for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Focused on defending clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440