FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in West Englewood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experience construction site accidents? Carlson Bier, a seasoned law firm based in Illinois, is your paramount choice for legal representation. Specializing in personal injury cases originating from construction mishaps, the expert team of attorneys at Carlson Bier are dedicated to fighting tirelessly for victims within West Englewood and beyond. They meticulously uncover each detail and use compelling evidence to construct solid case foundations that yield maximum compensation. Equipped with an unrivaled knowledge of Illinois statutes specific to construction site accidents, they provide unmatched guidance through the complex legal labyrinth you may face post-accident. Their unparalleled commitment ensures clients’ voices are heard while receiving just recompense for injuries sustained working on hazardous job sites like building constructions or thoroughfare projects. In the face of Construction Site disasters in West Englewood or any nearby area under Illinois jurisdiction, look no further than Carlson Bier–the skilled stalwarts when it comes to fighting against negligent parties involved in such unfortunate incidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in West Englewood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are well-versed in personal injury law and have carved a formidable reputation for ourselves through dedicated representation of victims who’ve suffered from construction site accidents in Illinois. Working within the legal field necessitates intricate knowledge and experience, vital factors we confidently bring to the table when handling such cases.

Construction site accidents can occur due to diverse circumstances and involve complex scenarios. Their aftermath often brings pain, confusion, mounting medical bills, loss of earnings, as well as long-term physical or psychological challenges. It’s also important that victims be aware of their rights under the law during these challenging times.

• You may be eligible for compensation if negligence at your workplace led to the accident happening.

• In cases where employers fail to adhere to OSHA regulations for maintaining a safe environment.

• If you were injured using faulty equipment which had not been inspected regularly.

• Even when worker error results in an accident due – organizational responsibility emerges provided conducive environments for that error aren’t precluded from query.

As your preferred choice attorney group, Carlson Bier will work diligently on your behalf so you receive maximum remuneration possible under Illinois state law parameters; meticulously investigating causality, identifying parties liable and competently negotiating or litigating ample rehouses on personal Injury matters.

Coincidentally while errors by workers might seem less initially but frequently add up into significant lawsuits against negligent employers offering lucrative compensatory packages making them viable avenues worth exploring.

The ramifications meted out because of employer negligence should never amount to life-altering consequences left unaddressed. For this reason alone our aptly equipped team is steadfast towards seeking due compensation that astutely addresses every facet involved – from tangible economic damages like escalating treatment costs; cost accrued over interruptions/breaks taken off work-life balance adaptation etc., all way down onto non-economic aspects including pain suffering endured over time which otherwise would go unnoticed under regular examination standards presented before us today like legal resolutions currently practicable.

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on delivering value beyond client anticipation levels using our skill sets which engage effectively right from initiation via sound advice that helps palletize complexities associated here; leading ultimately into decisive action taken where needed most – at courts across Illinois.

On this journey, you are never alone. We stand by your side firmly committed to unearthing every factoid relevant which subsequently reinforces claims raised whilst ensuring no stone is left unturned during vigorous exploration routines applied towards seeking justice served in full measure for victims who’ve had misfortune of encountering accidents occur on construction sites operating within state boundaries.

We are cognizant about dubious tactics used by insurance companies aiming towards minimizing payouts clients rightfully deserve post incidents like these unfolding at large scale – presenting another strong reason why having us represent interests ensures odds weigh heavily favor going forward together as one unified front tackling adversity head-on while striving to maximize recoveries with machine-like efficiency displayed relentlessly when it matters the most.

In conclusion, remember that a construction site accident shouldn’t be the end of your dreams or aspirations. You have legal rights and responsibilities that should be respected and fulfilled respectively. Click on the button below NOW to find out what your case might be worth, entrust Carlson Bier with an opportunity to guide you through this often complex process and allow us ease burdens otherwise inflicting undue stress over lives impacted adversely due circumstances unfolding around Accident scenes these days in Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For West Englewood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in West Englewood

Areas of Practice in West Englewood

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Offering adept legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing adept legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Fall Incidents

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Committed to aiding patients of car accidents get reasonable payout for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Truck Mishap

Extending expert legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Committed to providing professional legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and skilled legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to assisting patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440