FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in West Frankfort

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the realm of products liability law, Carlson Bier stands apart as a beacon of relentless advocacy and trusted legal counsel. Representing West Frankfort and beyond, we specialize in challenging cases involving defective products that cause harm to consumers. Curating a track record marked by prompt and successful resolutions, our commitment lies in ensuring your rights are safeguarded against larger manufacturers with recourse through deep-rooted understanding of relevant policies. What sets us apart? Our meticulous attention to detail combined with comprehensive investigative strategies which illuminate essential evidences proving product defects contributing towards injuries or damages sustained. As seasoned fighters for justice in complex Products Liability lawsuits, you can count on Carlson Bier’s expertise to attain due compensation commensurate with your harrowing experience or losses ensued therefrom; because at its heart- ours is an advocacy tailored specifically to defend the claimant’s interests rigorously till substantial justice is meted out.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in West Frankfort Illinois

Established and respected within the Illinois legal community, Carlson Bier are your trusted personal injury attorneys specializing in Products Liability Law. We have dedicated our practice to championing the rights of individuals who have been injured or harmed by defective items. Products liability law is intricate and involves an extensive range of products from medical implants to vehicle errors. Understanding these complexities can often be overwhelming; this is where we come in.

In simple terms, Products Liability refers to a manufacturer or seller being held liable for placing a defective product into the hands of consumers – YOU! The responsibility potentially lies with any party involved in the production process including manufacturers, wholesalers, supply chain agents, retailers among others. The nature of defects heavily tracked include manufacturing faults, design deficiencies and failings in providing adequate warnings or instructions related to the product’s usage.

To prove your case successfully you must establish that:

• The Product was defective

• This defect caused either injury or destruction while the product was used in its set application

• Use of product was aligned with its expected uses.

These crucial points nudges towards a deeper understanding on how important it becomes to engage expertise like Carlsons Bier when navigating through such disputes.

Liability laws operate under three main theories: negligence, strict liability and breach of warranty (including both express and implied). In negligent cases, you’ll need to prove that carelessness during manufacture/design led to your predicament. Strict liability shifts focus away from manufacturer’s behavior towards analyzing product’s safety – even without proving negligence; if a buyer/user was hurt due to an unsafe product- liable party must compensate damages! Finally breach of warranty encapsulates claims pursued under false promises about nature/quality/safety provided by trader concerning his merchandise against which recourse could subsume refund/replacement/compensation depending upon extent/mode of damage inflicted upon consumer.

Carlson Bier strives not just for justice but also for greater accountability amongst manufactures encouraging them to prioritize consumer safety over everything else. Moreover, our attorneys craft a customized legal strategy after devoting painstaking attention to each detail of your case for an assertive pursuit against responsible parties.

While we understand seeking legal help might seem daunting or expensive, fear not, because our law firm operates on a Contingency Fee Basis- meaning you owe nothing till we successfully recover damages for you! This ensures that every individual has access to justice and rightful compensation, regardless of their financial circumstances. Keep in mind; timing is key due the application of Statute Of Limitations which restricts the time period within which legal action can be sought. Therefore, it’s critical to commence with your lawsuit as soon as possible once aware of injurious implications linked with disputed product exposure.

By now, you would recognize Products Liability cases are highly complex and demanding – mandating adept legal representation by proficient attorneys such as ourselves at Carlson Bier who vow not just to represent but also inform & educate clients through each phase of litigation process. We encourage transparency combined with strong attorney-client relationships built on trust and commitment resulting in optimum outcomes.

Navigate no further; Connect with Carlson Bier today for unparalleled competence & comprehensive counsel in relation to products liability infractions. As personal injury lawyers based in Illinois – we stand ready to aggressively advocate on behalf of victims harmed by defective products and eventually holding party/parties liable accountable for inflicting unanticipated harm onto unsuspecting consumers.

Lastly, understanding what you could potentially earn from your lawsuit may provide some peace amidst chaos typically associated post injuries caused by faulty products or manufacturing failures. Find out how much your case is worth right here! Click on the button below and let us take it forward thereon ensuring you have complete insight about potential compensation bound coupled with assurance delivered through our empathetic yet effective attorney skills honed across countless lawsuits espousing similar situations like yours…Remember: Justice delayed is justice denied – act NOW!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For West Frankfort Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in West Frankfort

Areas of Practice in West Frankfort

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending adept legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Extending specialist legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal support to customers affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Trip Injuries

Skilled in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal aid for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents secure equitable compensation for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Crash

Providing expert legal services for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in supporting victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440