Trucking Accident Attorney in Windsor

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a trucking accident, swift and effective legal counsel is essential. The distinguished law firm, Carlson Bier is an expert jurisdiction in this area. Our experience within Windsor’s legal landscape has resulted in positive outcomes for numerous clients affected by catastrophic truck accidents. At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities that can arise from intricate federal regulations and company politics involved with such accidents. We focus on achieving both justice for you and ensuring responsible parties are held accountable for their negligence or recklessness.

Specializing exclusively in personal injury cases allows our team to give undivided attention to clients like yourself who need sound representation after a traumatic event.

Carlson Bier maintains consistent communication, guiding you through each step of your case while upholding ethical considerations set by Illinois Law.

We employ aggressive litigation techniques when necessary but ultimately strive towards maximizing your recovery through negotiation or settlement without escalating to disproportional court battles. As your advocate, Carlson Bier’s determined focus puts us at the forefront as potential legal partners amid unfortunate incidents involving trucks.

About Carlson Bier

Trucking Accident Lawyers in Windsor Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our extensive experience as personal injury attorneys has given us an in-depth understanding of the complexities surrounding trucking accidents. Navigating through a case involving a truck accident can be daunting for many victims, which is why we’re here to offer expertise and support for those seeking rightful compensation.

To begin with, it’s important to acknowledge that truck accidents are fundamentally different from regular car collisions. The scale of damage is typically larger due to the mass and momentum possessed by large freight carriers and semi-trucks. Potential injuries might range from minor cuts or bruises to significant harm such as broken bones, spinal injuries, brain traumas or even fatalities. Another defining factor concerns the multiple parties involved – unlike regular automotive accidents where typically only two drivers are involved; trucking accidents might pull in manufacturers, logistics companies, dispatchers or loaders into the legal whirlwind.

Key differences when dealing with truck accident cases include:

• Higher extent of damages: Trucking accidents often result in substantial physical injuries and property damage.

• Multiple liable parties: Any number of entities can be held responsible—from the driver to the owner of the truck or even its manufacturer.

• Distinct regulations: These mishaps fall under both federal & state laws—making them more complex than typical auto accidents.

Understanding these factors is crucial towards building a robust case. At Carlson Bier, we are committed to thoroughly examining every detail related to your incident in accordance with Illinois law. Our team’s persistent investigation often involves reviewing camera footage if available, poring over drivers’ logbooks for any irregularities or protocols that were not adhered to strictly — because even a minute discrepancy can swing the tide in your favor during negotiations with insurance companies.

Insurance claim representatives cooperate best when they understand you have experienced legal advisors on your side who won’t back down until justice is served fairly. Frequently asked questions about possible scenarios after a vehicle collision will be reviewed exhaustively during our consultation to gain an understanding of the accident’s impact on your life. We will work tirelessly, leaving no stone unturned, helping you recover emotionally and financially from a peripheral, if not central role in such a catastrophic event.

A trucking accident can turn your world upside down. Mounting medical bills, loss of income due to inability to work, severe pain and suffering — all these factors demand rightful compensation which we at Carlson Bier are determined to help you acquire. With every case being unique in its own way, it is critical that victims have aggressive representation from teams like ours who are well-versed in this area of personal injury law.

We understand the burden of dealing with insurance companies and their legal team but rest easy knowing we have decades-long experience behind us to combat any resistance met during claim proceedings. Let our expert attorneys do the heavy lifting while you focus on getting back on track after such a traumatic ordeal.

Our mission statement remains consistent: To zealously advocate for the rights of those injured due to another’s negligence or recklessness—because everyone deserves justice. While monetary compensation may not erase the event completely from memory, it certainly does provide some relief towards building up life again post such an unsettling incident.

Having worked on countless truck accident cases over the past several years has made us proficient at identifying potentially negligent parties quickly along with strategizing effective techniques aiming towards winning maximum reparation possible under Illinois law.

Knowing your case worth mitigates half of the anxiety surrounding legal battles – don’t miss out! Click on the button below right away for an evaluation complimentary from Carlson Bier experts now— because YOU matter most! Let us take care of everything else for you—we’re here every step forward towards ensuring your voice doesn’t go unheard into oblivion amidst bureaucratic complexities involved in personal injury lawsuits associated with truck accidents.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that: 1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages; 2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and 3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed. The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that: 1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and 2 setoff clauses were enforceable. Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted. Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that: 1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and 2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits. Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Windsor Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Trucking Accident FAQ​

Trucking accidents are often caused by a combination of factors, including driver fatigue, mechanical failures, improper loading of cargo, speeding, and inadequate driver training. External factors like poor road conditions and bad weather can also contribute.

Safety first: move to a safe area if possible. Call emergency services for medical and police assistance. Document the scene with photos and notes, and gather contact information from witnesses and all involved parties. It’s also crucial to seek medical attention, even if you feel fine, as some injuries may not be immediately apparent.

Liability in trucking accidents can be complex. It may involve the truck driver, the trucking company, manufacturers of truck parts, or other third parties. An investigation will typically look into the driver’s actions, vehicle maintenance records, the trucking company’s compliance with regulations, and other factors to determine fault.

Victims of trucking accidents may be entitled to various forms of compensation, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. In some cases, punitive damages might be awarded, especially if gross negligence or intentional misconduct is involved.

Trucking accidents often involve complex legal and regulatory issues. An attorney with experience in this field can navigate federal and state trucking laws, deal with large trucking companies and their insurers, and help ensure that you receive fair compensation. They can also assist in gathering evidence and expert testimonies necessary for building a strong case.

All Attorney Services in Windsor

Areas of Practice in Windsor

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving adept legal help for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, providing professional legal guidance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Stumble Injuries

Specialist in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents get fair recompense for wounds and damages.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in ensuring specialized legal representation for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer